if it is, are there any thoughts or concerns with our uses for the tubs?
-justin
still havent figd out links....
http://money.aol.com/usat/general/dangerous-plastics-the-bpa-problem?icid=100214839x1200810554x1200033209
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
- Archives of old MVF posts - . - ks's The Green Tree Python Forum - Chondro Forum - moreliapythons.com - ssnakess.com - chondroweb.nl - - - MVF Chatroom
|
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
justinvining |
Hidden Danger in polycarbonate tubs? |
Lead | |
|
saw this today, i dont know if this is an ingredient in the tubs a lot of us use, but i fugured someone would know.
if it is, are there any thoughts or concerns with our uses for the tubs? -justin still havent figd out links.... http://money.aol.com/usat/general/dangerous-plastics-the-bpa-problem?icid=100214839x1200810554x1200033209 |
|||
milmoejoe |
|||
|
It's not new news, but it is important.
Both the polycarbonate and PVC enclosure material is extremely unsafe. Unfortunately the effects are not immediate, so it's hard to detect. Lots of "But i've been using it for years!!" I actually have an article on captive animal exposure to bisphenol a from polycarbonate cages. Older, used cages are far worse than new! And, to add to it, exposure increases all the more with humidity...and what do you know- we spray our cages!!!!!!!!! Email me if you'd like a copy of it. |
|||
Blue Ridge Biological |
|||
|
I work for an organization that is concerned about the chemical in polycarbonate (Bisphenol A or BPA) that has been shown to be harmful. How much exposure
snakes get that are housed in polycarbonate tubs is the question. It is known that exceedingly small exposures to this chemical have been linked to certain
types of cancer and reproductive disorders, and like Joe Milmoe said, it's is not immediate so it can be hard make the correlation. Canada is taking steps
to ban the use of this chemical due to it's implications in harming human health. Yes, this stuff is widely used in the food industry, from food storage
tubs to the lining of the cans containing of canned foods and sodas. To anyone concerned about this chemical and what it could do to yourself or your children
(studies have shown that is has the potential to be much more harmful in developing bodies) you can find a lot on the topic in easily readable format at the
website of the organization I work for. Just go to this link and type in "polycarbonate" or
"bisphenol" as a key word.
While BPA can and does leach from polycarbonate as it ages, unsafe amounts have also been shown to readily leach from new polycarbonate animal enclosures. Below is an abstract from a paper published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives about the topic of BPA leaching from animal cages. Will Bisphenol A (BPA) is a monomer with estrogenic activity that is used in the production of food packaging, dental sealants, polycarbonate plastic, and many other products. The monomer has previously been reported to hydrolyze and leach from these products under high heat and alkaline conditions, and the amount of leaching increases as a function of use. We examined whether new and used polycarbonate animal cages passively release bioactive levels of BPA into water at room temperature and neutral pH. Purified water was incubated at room temperature in new polycarbonate and polysulfone cages and used (discolored) polycarbonate cages, as well as control (glass and used polypropylene) containers. The resulting water samples were characterized with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and tested for estrogenic activity using an MCF-7 human breast cancer cell proliferation assay. Significant estrogenic activity, identifiable as BPA by GC/MS (up to 310 [micro]g/L), was released from used polycarbonate animal cages. Detectable levels of BPA were released from new polycarbonate cages (up to 0.3 [micro]g/L) as well as new polysulfone cages (1.5 [micro]g/L), whereas no BPA was detected in water incubated in glass and used polypropylene cages. Finally, BPA exposure as a result of being housed in used polycarbonate cages produced a 16% increase in uterine weight in prepubertal female mice relative to females housed in used polypropylene cages, although the difference was not statistically significant. Our findings suggest that laboratory animals maintained in polycarbonate and polysulfone cages are exposed to BPA via leaching, with exposure reaching the highest levels in old cages. Key words: animal caging, bisphenol A, endocrine disruptor, estrogen, leaching, polycarbonate, polysulfone. |
|||
Blue Ridge Biological |
|||
|
Below is some breaking news from Chemical and Engineering News regarding Bisphenol A (the bad stuff in polycarbonate). I am proud to say that some of the work
I do played a role in making these restrictions happen.
Will Momentum Builds Against Bisphenol A Move to eliminate chemical from some products begins Rick Mullin and Susan Morrissey Canada moved last week to become the world's first country to set exposure limits on bisphenol A (BPA), a high-volume chemical used to make polycarbonate and epoxy resins. U.S. politicians proposed similar measures, and a leading supplier of plastic drinking bottles announced that it will stop manufacturing products that contain the chemical. Bowing to public concern over the health effects of BPA, bottle maker Nalgene said it will drop the use of polycarbonate. In addition, Wal-Mart, the world's largest retailer, announced it will stop stocking baby products containing the chemical immediately in Canada and early next year in the U.S. Toy store chain Toys 'R' Us has also announced a BPA phaseout for these products. Scrutiny of BPA increased earlier this month with the release of a draft report by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) on the health effects of the chemical. The report concluded that although BPA is generally safe, there is "some concern" that it may cause neural and behavioral changes in infants and children at current exposure levels (C&EN, April 21, page 11). The proposed ban in Canada targets polycarbonate baby bottles. Canadian Minister of Health Anthony P. Clement frames it as proactive. "Although our science tells us exposure levels to newborns and infants are below the levels that cause effects, it is better to be safe than sorry," he said, announcing the action. Barring any compelling information brought to light during a comment period that started on April 19, he added, the ban will take effect in mid-June. Canada's decision is based on its risk assessment of the chemical. The study found that BPA is not a concern for adults but may pose a risk for newborns and infants. Meanwhile, members of Congress are citing the NTP study in pushing for limits on BPA. Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) announced plans to introduce legislation to ban BPA in all children's products and "food contact" containers, such as water bottles. On the House side, the Energy & Commerce Committee, led by Reps. John D. Dingell (D-Mich.) and Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), is investigating the safety of BPA in baby products as part of its oversight of FDA. Manufacturers eliminating the chemical say they are taking action even in the absence of conclusive evidence of serious health risks. "Based on all the available scientific evidence, we continue to believe that Nalgene products containing BPA are safe for their intended use," says Steven Silverman, general manager of Nalgene's Outdoor line of polycarbonate containers. "However, our customers indicated they preferred BPA-free alternatives." Last week, a California mother filed a lawsuit against Nalgene claiming the company knew that BPA could leach from its bottles. Nalgene recently introduced a new line of bottles manufactured with an Eastman Chemical copolyester called Tritan. CamelBak, another supplier of polycarbonate bottles, is also switching to the Tritan material. Last month, Eastman announced that it will expand capacity for the copolyester at its plant in Kingsport, Tenn. In the infant care market, Playtex announced last week that it will phase out BPA-containing products by the end of the year. It is also distributing 1 million samples of a baby bottle product that employs disposable polyethylene bag inserts. Polycarbonate resins account for roughly three-quarters of U.S. demand for BPA; epoxy resins for high-performance coatings make up nearly all the rest. Most uses of these products-including automotive parts, compact discs, flooring products, and electronics-are not affected by the BPA initiatives. According to Mark Walton, communications leader for chemical and health issues at Dow Chemical, the number two U.S. producer of BPA, the impacted markets are "specialty" areas. "Our products tend not to be in the primary markets affected by the action in Canada," Walton says. "We are still trying to understand what kind of impacts current events could have on Dow's business." |
|||
milmoejoe |
|||
|
Here is my attempt at cut + paste of the article abstract.
Bisphenol A (BPA) is a monomer with estrogenic activity that is used in the production of food packaging, dental sealants, polycarbonate plastic, and many other products. The monomer has previ- ously been reported to hydrolyze and leach from these products under high heat and alkaline condi- tions, and the amount of leaching increases as a function of use. We examined whether new and used polycarbonate animal cages passively release bioactive levels of BPA into water at room temperature and neutral pH. Purified water was incubated at room temperature in new polycarbonate and poly- sulfone cages and used (discolored) polycarbonate cages, as well as control (glass and used polypropy- lene) containers. The resulting water samples were characterized with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and tested for estrogenic activity using an MCF-7 human breast cancer cell proliferation assay. Significant estrogenic activity, identifiable as BPA by GC/MS (up to 310 lg/L), was released from used polycarbonate animal cages. Detectable levels of BPA were released from new polycarbonate cages (up to 0.3 pg/L) as well as new polysulfone cages (1.5 fg/L), whereas no BPA was detected in water incubated in glass and used polypropylene cages. Finally, BPA exposure as a result of being housed in used polycarbonate cages produced a 16% increase in uterine weight in prepubertal female mice relative to females housed in used polypropylene cages, although the differ- ence was not statistically significant. Our findings suggest that laboratory animals maintained in polycarbonate and polysulfone cages are exposed to BPA via leaching, with exposure reaching the highest levels in old cages. |
|||
milmoejoe |
|||
|
Nice to know that you are working on this, Will- thank you!!
This is undoubtedly a thankless task which any intervention will be frowned upon by most! |
|||